|
Understanding the Rules on IRA Distributions
On January 11, 2001, the Internal Revenue Service introduced sweeping proposed changes to the regulations on required minimum distributions. Then, on April 17, 2002, the IRS released its final regulations detailing, simplifying and correcting the proposed changes.
The following are answers to frequently asked questions regarding these updated regulations and their expected impact on plan participants and their beneficiaries. Please note—this is only a brief summary of some very complex changes. We strongly advise you to consult your tax advisor for answers to questions about your specific circumstances.
In general terms, what do the new regulations mean?
They simplify the process of calculating an IRA owner’s required minimum distributions during his or her lifetime. In addition, the difficult question of whether to determine life expectancy by recalculating it each year is completely eliminated — now everyone benefits from annual recalculation without the penalties entailed by the old system. Third, most IRA holders and their beneficiaries benefit from smaller required minimum distributions, meaning that the money they’ve saved in an IRA will have longer to grow before being taxed. Finally, the new rules provide considerably more flexibility regarding post-death distributions.
How do the new rules simplify the process of calculating lifetime distributions?
Required minimum distributions will continue to be determined by dividing your IRA account balance, re-valued annually, by a life expectancy factor. Under the old rules, the life expectancy factor depended on whom you chose as your designated beneficiary and what method you selected to determine the life expectancy of yourself and your designated beneficiary. There were four possible methods of determining life expectancy to choose from if you designated a spouse as beneficiary, two tables to select from for non-spouse beneficiaries, and one last table that applied if you had no designated beneficiary.
The new regulations provide only two methods of estimating life expectancy: one for people whose sole beneficiary is a spouse more than 10 years younger called the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Tableand one for everyone else called the Uniform Table. You qualify to use one method or the other.
How does the Uniform Table work?
The Uniform Table assumes that you have a beneficiary who is 10 years younger than you are — no matter what age your beneficiary is and whether or not you even have a beneficiary. According to the Uniform Table, the distribution period for someone aged 70 is 27.4 years, which is the joint life expectancy of a 70-year-old and a 60-year-old. In contrast, for a 70-year-old with a same-age beneficiary, the old rules resulted in a joint life expectancy of 19.6 years. Since the Uniform Table spreads distributions out over a longer period of time, it results in smaller distributions, greater income tax deferral, and ultimately more money for your later years or your beneficiary.
What if my spouse is my beneficiary and is more than 10 years younger than I am?
Then you can base your required minimum distributions on the actual joint life expectancy of you and your spouse, which will result in even smaller distributions than those that would be mandated by the Uniform Table. See the Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table.
Are there any other benefits resulting from the changes?
Yes. The Uniform Table enables IRA participants to benefit from annual re-calculation of life expectancy without any of the drawbacks that applied to re-calculation under the old rules. As before, re-calculation produces a longer “stretch-out” of your distributions than the old “fixed-term” method. This is reflected in the Uniform Table’s life expectancy numbers, which decrease by less than one every year. In practice, this means that if you take only your required minimum distributions, your account will never be entirely drawn down regardless of how long you live. Under the old rules, on the other hand, a participant who chose to recalculate life expectancy created a less favorable situation—at death, the life expectancy of the deceased person dropped to zero. If a single life expectancy distribution was being used, this would force the beneficiary to withdraw 100% of the IRA’s balance by the end of the year following the year of the participant’s death.
The treatment of post-death recalculation under the new rules also is more favorable. The exact method of calculating distributions varies according to who the designated beneficiary is. But even in the worst-case scenario, where there is no designated beneficiary according to the IRS definition of that term, the assets of the plan are distributed according to the remaining fixed-term life expectancy of the participant as it existed on that person’s birthday in the year of death. In other words, the IRS figures the required minimum distribution as if the participant were still alive. Results in cases where there is a designated beneficiary are even more favorable. Thus, retirement plan participants enjoy the benefits of recalculation during life without penalizing their beneficiaries after death.
What other important changes will affect post-death distributions?
There are two other important modifications. First, required minimum distributions are now based on the life expectancies of the beneficiaries who actually inherit the benefits. Under the old definition, post-death distributions were based on the life expectancies of the beneficiary named on the date of death or the required beginning date (age 70 1/2), whichever occurred first. This meant that, for purposes of calculating required minimum distributions, the designated beneficiary was “locked in” when the participant reached age 70 1/2, even if the participant switched to a younger beneficiary thereafter.
Now the identity of the designated beneficiary is not finalized until September 30 of the year following the year of the participant’s death. This provision allows for some post-death adjustments—such as disclaimer, establishment of separate accounts, and eliminating beneficiaries by distribution of assets—to improve the choice of designated beneficiary. For example, the surviving spouse or child of an IRA holder might disclaim, or relinquish the right to, benefits and allow them to pass to a younger generation beneficiary, thereby enabling the use of more favorable life expectancy calculations and smaller required minimum distributions.
Who will benefit from these changes?
While the benefits are widespread, two groups are likely to feel the biggest impact: spouses and charities. Most spouses of IRA owners are close in age to their husbands or wives. Nonetheless, they still benefit from the generous assumptions of the Uniform Table, which is based on the life expectancies of a beneficiary 10 years younger than the participant. Charities also benefit. Previously, because charities could not qualify as designated beneficiaries, participants who named charities as beneficiaries were forced to use their single life expectancies to determine required minimum distributions. Now charities can take advantage of the Uniform Table and the resulting more favorable required minimum distributions.
When do the new rules take effect?
These new rules were effective January 1, 2003. The new regulations are not retroactive — they cannot be used to recalculate required minimum distributions for years prior to 2001.
| 
